Rhythm Lost
Blog Posted by
Just That Archaic Poet: 10/23/2013 3:04:00 PM
Rhyme. RHYME! I'm a rhymer; an old rhymer. It's what I do; it's my forte...and, my preference. Why? Because of the rhythm, that's why. I understand the freedom that "free-verse" and its ilk provide, but...more oft than not, I feel no rhythm in those forms; the drumbeat that stirs, thrills and excites my Soul is absent. Does not most art revolve around rhythm? Imagine music sans rhythm, or dance for that matter. Even drawing and painting has a certain rhythm (not always, but usually; same with dance).
I just don't understand this modern fascination, almost fanaticism concerning non-rhyming poetry. It seems to be the most preferred style, and I cannot fathom or comprehend why. Again, I understand the lure of freedom; I've written free-verse pieces, albeit very, very few.
Rhyme, if executed correctly, is clearly superior. Words should roll effortlessly off the tongue and the rhythm should flow like a stream upon which my emotions float, being carried with sound and beat. Free-verse rarely accomplishes this feat.
Do modern poets flock to this form because of the freedom, or because it is much easier to master? Perhaps my opinion is unpopular, but I fervently believe anyone can write free-verse and slap the label of "poetry" upon it.
A true poet is a master of words and commands the form of rhyme much the same way as a conductor to an orchestra. Free-verse, haiku, etc. DO have their merits, but they do not excite or entice me. Rhythm, rhyme and reason all go hand in hand. I just wish more people would appreciate rhyme and write more of it. Enough of the other; bring back the classic form. I know; I know: I am hopelessly Archaic...