|
| |
To Richard Dawkins and His Imp
***Richard Dawkins is a leading scientific-atheist who claims
that the universe was created from 'nothing'; he also snubs
belief in God and is an activist against spirituality and religion.
This man is funded and hired by the NWO in an attempt to
remove all obstacles in the way of world domination.***
Something came from nothing?
What's this?
Am I supposed to believe also that from something nothing comes?
Hmmm......
Number one:
Einstein once said that only a fool would claim
to know the absolute --- since we still have to do
research we cannot claim to know EVERYTHING
Number two:
Science has not even to be able to solve the
mysteries of the simplest atom: the hydrogen atom
So how can it claim to know the immense
mysteries and design of the universe?
Number three:
It is claimed that there is only one in a ten
trillion chance that the universe was not CAUSED
Number four:
Visual proof for the existence of God is uneccessary:
Almost EVERYTHING we KNOW is unseen
Consider this: if one were to require visual evidence
for God's existence it would be quite impossible;
they are asking the most powerful being in all
existence to unveil Himself in compact form: they
would be incinerated
Number five:
There are three forms of knowledge: perception,
reason, and intellect. The ultimate design of
the universe can only be grasped by the
intellect. Science only uses perception
and reason to deduct facts about the
material world. Physics cannot claim
to know the ultimate origin of life ITSELF
for this is the field of metaphysics.
Number six:
We are only some 300 generations removed
from the Stone-Age; we are only beginning to
understand the origin and nature of our existence.
Being the world that the state that is in ---- science
is too slow with its turtle pace to solve our most
difficult problems; morality and ethics ---- which is
infinitely more important than science since there
will be no science if we destroy the earth.
Since we live in a temporal plane, in which
all things have a beginning and an end,
everything is contingent upon something
else for its existence; if we were to trace
the origins of this process we must arrive
to something unlike the contingent, for it can
only be something un-contingent which
began everything; else chance would be
the cause of life as know it, yet chance
requires two or more things for it to
happen at all.
Copyright ©
Keith O.J. Hunt
|
|