Home » Poems » Keith O.J. Hunt » To Richard Dawkins and His Imp

To Richard Dawkins and His Imp

***Richard Dawkins is a leading scientific-atheist who claims
that the universe was created from 'nothing'; he also snubs
belief in God and is an activist against spirituality and religion.
This man is funded and hired by the NWO in an attempt to
remove all obstacles in the way of world domination.***


Something came from nothing?
   What's  this?
   Am I supposed to believe also that from something nothing comes?
   Hmmm......

Number one:

Einstein once said that only a fool would claim 
  to know the absolute --- since we still have to do
  research we cannot  claim to know EVERYTHING 

Number two:

Science has not even to be able to solve the
  mysteries  of the simplest atom: the hydrogen atom 
  So how can it claim to know the immense 
mysteries and design of the universe?

Number three:

It is claimed that there is only one in a ten
  trillion chance that the universe was not CAUSED

Number four:

Visual proof for the existence of God is uneccessary:
  Almost  EVERYTHING we KNOW is unseen
  Consider this: if one were to require visual evidence 
  for God's existence it would be quite impossible;
  they are asking the most powerful being in all
  existence to unveil Himself in compact form: they
  would be incinerated 

Number five:

There are three forms of knowledge: perception,
  reason, and intellect. The ultimate design of
  the universe can only be grasped by the 
  intellect. Science only uses perception
  and reason to deduct facts about the 
  material world. Physics cannot claim
  to know the ultimate origin of life ITSELF
  for this is the field of metaphysics.

Number six: 

We are only some 300 generations removed
from the Stone-Age; we are only beginning to 
understand the origin and nature of our existence.
Being the world that the state that is in ---- science
is too slow with its turtle pace to solve our most
difficult problems; morality and ethics ---- which is 
infinitely more important than science since there
will be no science if we destroy the earth.

Since we live in a temporal plane, in which 
all things have a beginning and an end, 
everything is contingent upon something 
else for its existence; if we were to trace
the origins of this process we must arrive
to something unlike the contingent, for it can 
only be something un-contingent which 
began everything; else chance would be
the cause of life as know it, yet chance
requires two or more things for it to
happen at all.

Post Comments

Poetrysoup is an environment of encouragement and growth so only provide specific positive comments that indicate what you appreciate about the poem. Negative comments will result your account being banned.

Please Login to post a comment

John Hamilton

Date: 5/3/2017 9:03:00 PM

This is so well done, I'm going to print a copy and review it. I wrote an atheists letter to God a little tongue in cheek I must say, also poets and artists are proof of God's existence, 2 which come to mind quickly. You have summed the truth up so well here in this piece. Hope you can read one of mine, similar concept but i like yours better. John

Keith O.J. Hunt
Date: 5/4/2017 9:04:00 AM

Thanks John for uniting minds; that was (and is) my aim. By all means copy it --- tell or give some to your friends, what I mentioned in this work is only the tip of the iceberg; a colleague and I are working on a book that aims to open doors leading to a new spirituality (not a religion) that embraces all practices, with sound philosophy and logic.You may soupmail me if you want:-)

Doug Vinson

Date: 4/7/2017 4:59:00 PM

300 generation - hey, I think we've done pretty well... : P

Debbie Duncan

Date: 3/3/2017 3:01:00 AM

I loved reading this, I know a few atheist.

Keith O.J. Hunt
Date: 3/3/2017 2:04:00 PM

Thanks Debbie, I know a few atheists as well; they now argue that the universe is eternal, but its wardrobe or the things that make it what it is ---- is temporal, something began everything else but it is unlike anything else, only God could fulfill this role.

Rob Carmack

Date: 3/1/2017 7:50:00 AM

Exactly Keith, it is absurd for those who try to use Empiricism to negate the metaphysical. This is beyond the scope of science. Science can not escape infinite regression and this is exactly why at this point, Dawkins becomes intellectually dishonest. He is just a different kind of faither.

Keith O.J. Hunt
Date: 3/3/2017 1:57:00 PM

Thanks Rob, very true your points of view, Dawkins has 'faith' in science --- but science can never faith in him; he worships inanimate objects, and faith is metaphysical.