The Tale of Two Bible's

THE TALE OF TWO BIBLE'S Genesis, Eve conceived a man child with the help of the Lord, Cain was always preceived as the first born of Adam, so Abel must have been first the born via the serpent, Eve (would) have a seed that would bruise the serpents head a statement that is made after Eve conceived a child with the help of Lord, who was Cain, and as it was Abel whose head was bruised he had to be the son of the serpent, so again Abel was the first child to be born but just not the first born to Adam, so effectivly ignored as the first born of God and Adam's family line, it seems a total condication of word play, if Cain was the true son of Adam and Abel was not as he was born from the serpent could go a long way to explaining as to why God could not kill Cain as they were actually blood-related and God could not kill one of his own, so had no choice but to banish his own son, the serpent may have beguiled Eve but God who was no fool then helped Eve to conceive Cain who was prophesied to go on to kill Abel, so just why did God reject his own son's offering knowing this and favoured the meat of Abel the son of the serpent if it was not to anger Cain into killing Abel in the first place, why did God not just kill the serpent's son by his own hand, clever. Eyes blind, cannot see Deception wrote, deceives all, twisted truth unfolds. Now in Mary I do believe and in Jesus’s good word, he fasted a lot and had no wish to eat meat, a heart that radiated good and his belief in a true God, was Jesus Essesen or Pescatarian, fish was clearly eaten though in Jesus's case that was never actually proven, eating fish does not make man aggressive or increase his need to kill and was Jesus not showing you the way with the symbol that also represents Christianity the fish, so who was this so-called God that the Canaanite come Jews write about, that eats meat and tells them to kill others while appraising their sad desire to please him, wasn't this God in fact Satan getting the Canaanites come Jews to do his dirty work whilst getting his hands on the new Israel power point under false pretensions of being God. Read between the lines Findeth only what is right, waylay all falsehood. Does one really need a Bible to understand God’s word; his word is inside of you, therefore do we have a need of a book of guidance that is plagued with falsehoods written by those only to confuse. Authors can relate But the scribes who translates, twist the words to suit. Indiana Shaw