Connie Pachecho Biography

 

Dear Readers,

 

I joined this site under dark clouds. For I ran from my past and black bears. Poetry Soup allowed me to recalibrate. It was the antidote that steered me in the right direction. Writing poems allowed me to soften my rough edges-to see deer, and to disengage from my unsavory past. My eyes opened. And I laughed once again, especially at reading my poems. In some ways, all modesty aside, I think I have a creative side and can make readers laugh. 

 

What should be noted is that nobody in my family, friendships, Facebook, or workplace is privy to my moonlighting. It's best that way. I would rather spread my ink in solitude, being incognito, being in my own little world, doodling here, doodling there, to the circle of readers here. My kid sister sees me as an illiterate clown. I don't blame her. But if only she knew of the other side.

 

The years passed by quickly, too quickly, and some days, some poems were better than others. There have been no trophies, POTD, or top 100 list, but the true litmus test I see is what I see in myself-I feel extremely satisfied with my passage here. Honestly. 

 

Briefly, I reside in Hawaii and leave no branches on the tree. Underachieved in school, life, and advancing forward (college dropout). Had great eye and hand coordination in excelling in sports and games. But when it came to choosing friends and making career choices, I was completely blind. My favorite hobby and leisure is being married to books, and caring for my Maltese.

 

I'm not wrapping it up. But you never know when the door closes. Hence, this bio today (I didn't want to leave a blank page), and I wanted to say in advance, as tears run down my face, thank you, readers, for your visits, cups of tea, hugs, and for allowing me to share in the relaxed ambiance of Poetry Soup.

 

Blessings, and hugs to all

 

Connie Pachecho

 

10/16/25100,000+ Free Sea & Nature Images - Pixabay

AI CONTEST ENTRIES THAT GO UNCHECKED

Blog Posted by Connie Pachecho: 1/25/2026 5:41:00 AM

Please Login to post a comment
Pachecho Avatar
February 12, 2026 at 4:39 PM
Final thought-I thank the readers for their interactions and comments. It shows that we all care about the direction that our poetry is taking. The idea is that if there's a protest, our voices can be heard by the administrators of Poetry Soup, and this stirring of the soup can bring changes. As PS evolves, I would like to see a new feature included with my Premium Membership---a green check mark earned that my poetry is not AI-generated and receives Poetry Soup's seal of approval, and accreditation that I am absolutely a human writer and not a bot. There might be a lot of work, but it's good work. This means a lot to me. It shows that I have integrity and distance myself from the AI poets that are finding a home here. Someday, soon, I hope this idea can materialize and see perhaps a green flaming icon next to my name symbolizing that I am down to earth. Thank you, sincerely.
Barden Avatar
February 2, 2026 at 8:21 AM
I agree with this almost 100%, however I am an admin on one of Facebook’s largest poetry groups with literally tens of thousands of members, and almost 98% of what we do these days is just check for AI, and it’s absurd how much we get - AI has literally ruined reality, and this goes for all the arts – poetry, music, art, you name it … it’s sad. We use three different screening tools to do this with, and in the process over the last few months, we have discovered that you can only mark someone’s poem as AI if it comes back 100%. If a poem comes back with a high percentage on all three tools, we will issue what we call a “cautionary”, which basically just tells the author that we have screened it, that it has come back with a high percentage, and could they please check their own work in the future before submitting, because if it happens three times we will suspend them temporarily. Many that come back like this are just a particular of AI screening software, as ANY poem in existence, whether written by a famous poet from the past or even written by ourselves, can come back very often with a certain percentage as AI, and this is because we use the same words, phrases, and grammar as everyone does, including AI. So I would just caution on calling anything AI unless it comes back 100%. Just my two cents from what I have experienced. Thanks so much for listening. :o) <3
Richards Avatar
February 2, 2026 at 12:33 PM
Hi Greg, Nice to hear from you. Your post is rather interesting. I'm curious: do you use paid programs or the free (trial runs) I am forced to use when I get round to it? All this scaremongering around AI is to sell AI Checkers, I think. You have got an ear for music - you know when someone or something sounds off, eg dear old Cliff does not sound himself anymore and no one as far as I know quite does Adele ... Same with poetry: English has over one million words and the computations are endless. But AI sounds flat. When you read enough of it (not only poetry) there is no mistaking the flatness of it. AI detectors work by pattern recognition. I prefer not to farm out my critical thinking to a computer. In your case - given the volumes - it is understandable that you would rely on Checkers. But for my contests, I prefer to judge the old fashioned way: what appeals to me and contest requirements met. I agree that caution should be the order of the day.
Seeker Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 6:31 PM
Yes, a problem, this AI. For my contests I do check but it is exhausting, so I have in fact taken a break from sponsoring new contests for a while. Moreover, the engines are not infallible and come up with different results. Now with humanising AI poetry programs available, the degree of difficulty has increased.
La France Avatar
January 30, 2026 at 4:26 AM
Seeker, don't get discouraged by this AI curse. I have told you in the past that I use 6 AI Detectors and yes, I get different conclusions, and it takes time but I take the average, for example if 4 say high source of AI, then it is AI for my contests. Plus, I keep a list of known AI users, but some do get by me at times, maybe once but not twice because others will send me messages to identify them and on my list they go. Sadly, some have figured out how to trick the AI detectors, one name comes to me right away. I am into forgiving mistakes but AI fraud, claiming something as your own when you did not write it, shameful. Of course, their poems will place in contests or get POTD, POTW this is unforgivable and I don't think we should just accept this ever.
Richards Avatar
January 29, 2026 at 4:22 AM
Yes, please :)
Seeker Avatar
January 29, 2026 at 4:17 AM
Ah, I think I should continue my work in that case, notwithstanding challenges posed
Richards Avatar
January 29, 2026 at 3:36 AM
I liked your contests, Seeker - it appealed to the thinking poet in me. Using Checkers like GPTZero are notoriously inaccurate. For example, using it to point out AI in a POTD I think is reckless as some might even score as high as 100% AI-generated!!! I still think that if you like a contest entry it is your perodative to place it or not.
Richards Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 5:52 AM
An afterthought: Hell knows no fury like a poet accused of posting AI-generated poems. I supposed that TPS is not looking for legal ramifications and wouldn't readily remove poems, eg, from POD. Just my penny's worth.
Richards Avatar
January 29, 2026 at 11:37 PM
@Anaya< Thanks for the tip, but I will pass.
Richards Avatar
January 29, 2026 at 11:36 PM
"AI-generated poetry is that which was WHOLLY produced by AI, even if the person had submitted the prompt themselves." Quote from my article, posted October 2024: AI Assist versus AI-generated Poetry | PoetrySoup.com
Richards Avatar
January 29, 2026 at 9:42 AM
AI does not bother me. I will help those poets who want to learn new skills, and in the process, I learnt as well.
Richards Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 1:27 PM
Don't farm out your critical thinking to AI tools. It is not the tools, but understanding how to use AI responsibly, and not to waste time chasing shadows. It is up to TPS to act or not.
Kitchin Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 12:46 PM
The issue I have is that if you use more than one AI detector, you get different results. What is accurate? We need better tools.
Richards Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 8:59 AM
Thank you, Connie - I will have a look. I stopped reading PODs for over a year now because of the AI ...
Pachecho Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 7:12 AM
Regarding POTD: I see MAVERICK got his today. Great. I can assure you he's as real as it gets.
Pachecho Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 7:05 AM
The ADMIN is not perfect. But when I see how they did some housecleaning of the prior POTD selections of AI use, deleting the red-handed, this tells me that they're trying to right the ship. This is a great start and sign for the poetry community. For PS has our interest and the interest of all poetry enthusiasts because these intruders with AI in their pockets touch our home, and the sting feels greater. With the microscope magnifying AI poems and entries the hope, now, is that it deters future usage,
Volumes Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 12:35 AM
I recently read that on scientific, political and scholarly authority "The smartest being in this world today is no longer human" What chance do we have of successfully detecting, let alone defeating AI in the realm of art if AI is more intelligent than we poor struggling humans? Art is for pleasure, Create it if you are able.. it gives pleasure. I cant imagine what pleasure there is in having a robot write a poem for you, paint a picture, sing a song, take a photograph or write a book. Their pleasure must be in winning contests and having nice things said. Let it be folks the contest win wont be as gratifying as completing your work of art knowing that its your creation.
Kitchin Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 3:39 AM
I saw a news clip recently about an AI robot that can do household chores. It was very creepy and made me think of the "Terminator" movie. AI has it's place and benefits but not for poetry or creativity. I see it the same as cheating.
Richards Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 12:58 AM
You are touching on a sensitive aspect of this debate here. I don't think it is about being smart (opposed to being not smart) to be able to detect AI usages. It is being street wise in the technology age. We can all look out for one another.
Flood Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 11:57 AM
Well, I know I’m real… AI doesn’t get writer’s block…… and I’m up to my armpits in one. Have to say, I find it perverse to ask poets to check their own jottings for AI content… They already know the answer to the question and I certainly would never post a poem written entirely from my own head and then ‘admit’ that it’s 10% AI… because the Bots said so. I don’t have the answer, but I don’t think self certification will do the job. Anyway I’m off to press the ‘generate’ button…… I mean… write myself a masterpiece ;-)
Dietrich Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 4:36 PM
You are real, poet. Like that sweet velveteen rabbit.
Richards Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 12:19 PM
At least you have not lost your sense of humour, Terry :)
Flood Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 12:16 PM
My usual cure is to start writing gibberish and see what happens…. Sometimes something special appears. And yes, I’ve written so many poems about being ‘blocked’ that readers could be excused for rolling their eyes and moving on… ho hum.
Richards Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 12:10 PM
Ah, a poem about writers blog ... Or has it been done before? Poetry is to be the cure for writers blog, but in your case - your guess is as good as mine what will cure it. Hope the reset button works :)
Pachecho Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 7:41 AM
I know it's not possible, but I can dream of the poetry contest in Pennsylvania--Linguistic humor, Timbuktu--raw, live and honest poetry. No AI. No tools. Just paper and pen ... those were the days my friend ... The National Poetry Contest had come down to two semifinalists: a Yale graduate and a redneck from Wyoming. They were given a word, then allowed two minutes to study the word and come up with a poem that contained the word. The word they were given was "Timbuktu". First to recite his poem was the Yale graduate. He stepped to the microphone and said: Slowly across the desert sand Trekked a lonely caravan. Men on camels, two by two Destination---Timbuktu. The crowd went crazy! No way could the redneck top that, they thought. The redneck calmly made his way to the microphone and recited: Me and Tim a-huntin went, Met three whores in a pop up tent. They was three, and we was two, So I bucked one, and Timbuktu. The redneck won hands down!
Dietrich Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 12:36 PM
Oops. I just now see my response to John had jumped up here!
Dietrich Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 11:15 AM
Well I already basically mentioned some kind of warning system be used and I was being serious. I heard it is used at another site! Keep being your great authentic self, John
Dietrich Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 11:04 AM
Good one, and for sure, that Ain't an example of an AI winner!
Kitchin Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 8:29 AM
Connie, that is hilarious. Love the red neck's poem. Very authentic. :)
Richards Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 8:00 AM
;)
Lawless Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 3:58 AM
perhaps a 'DISHONORABLE MENTION" section in the contest results....Being among the last of the luddites and lacking the tech savvy to access, or use, AI intentionally(unless you count the dictionary) I too am weary of sponsoring any more contests. Perhaps a separate "app" that could say..."danger Will Robbins, danger". I just write 'em and hope someone reads them and enjoys them.
Dietrich Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 12:37 PM
A comment I made to you here jumped up above under Connie's comment. FYI
Godwin Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 11:54 AM
I endorse the 'DISHONORABLE MENTION' idea.
Richards Avatar
January 27, 2026 at 4:48 AM
Your tongue in cheek method sounds good, John. My tip to sponsors: Keep notes of your top winners' poems and screenshots of your AI findings. You never know when you would be called upon to defend your decisions on a public platform. ;)
Kauffman Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 5:18 PM
Agreed, Connie! Writer's who us AI are not only cheating but are cheating themselves of the joys of creating something precious and treasured! Thank you for your blog.
La France Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 3:29 AM
Connie, AI users are getting good at beating the AI checkers, so even if a contest sponsor checks each poem on 6 detectors or more we get different results, it makes it difficult. I have a list of known AI users and all I can do is make sure they do not place in my contests, AI checkers are predictable like ABAB rhyming patterns, set number of syllables per line, stanzas and number of lines, that is why I mix it up in my contest, anyways these people are a disgrace and should be ashamed. I have reported many and admin cannot do anything. Constance
Godwin Avatar
January 28, 2026 at 11:47 AM
I can't think of one single business for profit that ever thought it had enough money. MONEY, MONEY, MONEY
Lane Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 1:15 PM
Oh, I think their pockets have enough loose change to administer to the needs of what was once a good place to post poetry with people of like minds.
Godwin Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 10:41 AM
I don't like saying it, much less thinking it, but we live in a world that is regrettably money based and that may be the reason admin 'cannot' do anything???? Dollars rule.
Dietrich Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 10:31 AM
Can administration really "not" do anything? I like how hard you try with your contests. But we are all like Don Quijote fighting at windmills.
Kitchin Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 7:40 AM
Constance, very good points. The issue I have with AI checkers is, are they accurate? I have checked some of my poems that are 100 percent authentic, written by me and it showed AI. That is concerning. At some point I may take a break from running contests, it's getting too much these days. I do have several on a my list as well that I know of who have used AI and plagiarism and they are flagged. I would hate to accuse someone of using it when they are not. We need better AI detectors too. It seems the world is being taken over by AI.
Pachecho Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 6:40 AM
Constance, I like how you root out the disease and preserve the Cherry Blossoms, where the pollen is spread, making the park even prettier. Thank you for all you (and Andrea, Suzette, Tania, and the many others) do in sponsoring contests.
Pachecho Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 3:08 AM
Regarding contest entries: The system I would like to see in place is the honor system. Poets would check off a box certifying that they scanned their poems through an AI checker showing that their poems are a 100% human written. This system has no ambiguity. It’s straightforward, and it takes checking for AI-generated poems out of the hands of the contest sponsors that are already burdened with enough work in judging contests. However, the poets who commit fraud, certifying that their poem is 100% human written when in fact the evidence points that their poem Is AI generated, should be deactivated from Poetry because signing a deposition and willfully deceiving the honor system is perjury in the real world. This is punishable. And it should be. I think there should be consequences for lying and committing fraud, and by doing so, this roots out the cheaters and makes for a happy, cleaner, and fairer community pool and a tastier bowl of soup. I think it’s honorable for those poets to step forward and make a confession, show that they’re contrite, and ask for forgiveness because you really don’t want to leave this world with being a cheater on your conscience. The best scenario is to move forward. Start fresh. The marbles that you lost with the AI frenzy, and recovery thereof, could lead to being a better human being, and that counts higher than all the contest placements and wins.
Dietrich Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 10:40 AM
Several people here have noted that their own poetry checks out as a certain percentage AI. I am sure with time, more and more poets will see those percentages increasing. Some poets have even learned to beat the system. A very smart poet friend of mine told me his poems sometime show AI. Instead of looking for 100% human , we should be concerned if a person's poetry is consistently 80 to 100% AI. I wish my friend would come here and discuss how another poetry site he uses is able to check contest poems with at least several AI checkers , kind of how Constance is doing things. But I think the responsibility for this checking should fall on administration, not on the contest sponsors.
Radice Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 11:19 PM
I’d be happier if any ‘poet’ using AI just admitted it but alas that’s not always going to happen. I have suggested in the past for the onus to placed on the poet entering the contest rather than the judge. I think the poet should denote alongside their contest entry the % AI found using the specific AI checker chosen by the judge. It’s then open to scrutiny by all who read it with an emphasis on honesty. It might - just might - put people off entering AI poems. Cheers - Gary
Dietrich Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 10:42 AM
Oh I see what you are saying now. Not a bad idea if they can find a really fair and reliable AI checker!
Radice Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 1:32 AM
No sadly people using AI almost certainly won’t admit it but that wasn’t really my point. My main point was to make all contest writers put their own poem through a dedicated AI checker themselves that’s been chosen by the sponsor and write what % AI it shows at the top of the poem (remaining there until some time after results are published). Everyone can then see and check if the poet has been honest. Who would try and cheat putting 0% next to their poem when it can be checked by all and sundry and proven not to be so? Just a suggestion. Cheers - Gary
Dietrich Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 12:37 AM
Would someone using AI actually admit it? I just don't see that
Richards Avatar
January 26, 2026 at 12:28 AM
Gary, remember the furor around me suggesting that "AI-generated" should be included in the list of types of poems? Yes, it would call upon the honesty of the poet, but I feel that the stigma would be removed or minimized at least. Yes, us sponsors do the checking, but the bald face lies when called out, gets me down. So, now I just "N/A" and be done with it.
Richards Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 8:59 PM
Spotting AI usage is not only for poetry - it is a life skill worth cultivating, especially when social media is awash with generated articles, and some podcasts set out to gaslight the readers & listeners. My blog is perhaps helpful in this regard: JUDGING GUIDE FOR SPONSORS - Suzette Richards's Blog (poetrysoup.com) Connie: You may delete this comment if you feel it is off topic.
Godwin Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 8:31 PM
It makes me ill. Authentic is what I feel sure we're meant to be in every endeavor, well, every minute. Thank you for posting this. I've found a good checker and revealed a lot about a lot of people. What's odd to me is that some of them can write just fine on their own and mostly do. I'll never understand. Shame on them. How is any fake win a win at all? A fake poem isn't real; it came from electronics for cookies sake. Now ads are offering REAL animal emotional love with AI cats and dogs. A whole generation of kids are going to grow up thinking/feeling something w/o a heartbeat is loving them and they will reciprocate. How is that going to work out? The world has become beyond sad to me. Given enough time, humans will have nothing to do. I don't think we should drink the kool aid on Soup, please, let's not.
Dietrich Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 10:53 PM
They are drinking the Kool aid all over this crazy country and in the entire world. Would love to go back to around 2010 and see no more advancements past then in technology.
Richards Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 9:22 PM
Poetic voices and “feelings” are no longer a barometer for AI usage. When poets use a particular AI programme long enough (some for close to 2 ½ years!), it successfully emulates that poet’s voice (writing in the style of the poet). The sheer volume of contests on here and the desire to support a number of sponsors might be the reason why even some salted poets are resorting to submit AI-generated (or in part) poetry. Some efforts are clearly translations of existing poetry run through an AI app - and a poor job at that, but it is still plagiarism! Another contributing factor is that the landscape on here has changed drastically. Sponsors used to bring new and exciting poetic forms or skills to the table, and the contestants embraced it whole heartedly. Now, people are no longer interested to learn new skills and would rather resort to using AI – just an insultingly lazy way to support a contest.
Cunningham Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 12:46 PM
A sad day for all the genuine poets on here, having to compete with AI generated poems, Sadly AI is becoming more human and hard to spot. I don't know how those using AI generated poems sleep at night . It used to be the bees knees on here but now it's like a dying empire. Tom
Dietrich Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 1:05 PM
Yes, Tom. And I can see with my own eyes one person in particular whose writing has drastically changed. But I can't spot it with new poets and I don't feel it should be the sponsors' responsibility to decide who is or is not using it. I never signed on as a contest sponsor to become an AI detector as well. Why can't Soup throw off the poets that for sure are showing AI almost all the time? I heard of another poetry site where the monitors determine if poets are doing this. At least in Premier contests, couldn't an AI protocol be set up by Soup that would function when they submit a poem to the contest? (Like 3 times showing significant AI use in one poem and the poem is eliminated as a contest entry?) A friend of mine mentioned another site where this is done.
Kitchin Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 12:17 PM
Connie, a great blog and I agree 100 percent. There are many now on PS that spoil the soup. It's no longer the fun ingredients of talent, fun and great skill. It is now AI users, and plagiarists. Some even steal lines of poems to make new poems. It doesn't go unnoticed accept by the admins. Some who block honest poets for seeing through their BS. I am saddened by the state of the site but refuse to leave, at least at this time. The integrity has changed in PS.
Dietrich Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 1:16 PM
I am glad you will stay despite the loss of integrity here . I hope it's only a few bad apples spoiling the bunch and not a lot of them. Unlike Suzette, I can't really spot AI use very well, and I fear I have given praise to poets using it.
Lane Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 8:09 AM
Hi Connie. The troll and bully bloodied soup was toxic enough and then a blind eye was given to AI. I am aware of the one of whom you speak, who is also the protagonist in the post I made about stealing a contest theme from a friend. A proven plagiarist was banned and then allowed back in. It’s why I seldom visit the site and only enter contests of a chosen few who do not tolerate the use of either. I swim in other waters where the mosquitoes don’t sting poets and then profess their innocence in the name of humor. It’s where there’s no talk of what would instill brotherhood and yet is the root cause of angst and disruption. I expect there will be mosquito buzzing about my comments but I’ve become immune to the stings. The guilty doth protest too much.
Pachecho Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Hi Lin. Unfortunately, it's the innocent poets caught in the middle, like yourself, that are suffering from the collateral damage. With no resolution in sight, it doesn't look promising. The blind eye is filled with ambivalence. Contradiction. They don't know what direction they're taking regarding A-I, and to see that POTD selection (AI enhanced) takes the cake from all the poets here that are true to themselves and others.
Richards Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 6:22 AM
Discounting the arguments around AI Checkers, it is as clear as daylight that some poets' work had deteriorated, often displaying common AI mistakes such as incorrect syllable counts, weird vocabulary, the ever present dashes [for example: "The administration served up a transparent lie — one so obvious it couldn’t be effectively spun."] and quoted text ((trying to sound "cool"), and many others. Yes, just once in a Blue Moon, an AI-generated poem is not all that bad, but on a whole, they sound like paper whirring on a rusty bicycle wheel - same old, same old. The real effect on us all is that this site might lose it's readers ... But then: why would bots worry about it as they are not really poets, are they?
Pachecho Avatar
January 25, 2026 at 6:55 AM
All the great poets everywhere, especially here, have a natural voice, a distinct signature to their writing, and a soul, heart and a tell. It's an authentic voice. The AI writings I see here is cookie cutter perfect. I smelt a rat. So I had to see for myself and did AI check of a sampling of their poems. It's cubic zirconia. Personally I don't like swimming in the same pool as they do.

Previous Blogs

The Fifty New Poem's List
Date Posted: 7/28/2026 4:38:00 PM
What Do You Say To The Poets Who Use AI?
Date Posted: 7/2/2026 9:40:00 AM
AI CONTEST ENTRIES THAT GO UNCHECKED
Date Posted: 1/25/2026 5:41:00 AM
Dearest Poetry Soup
Date Posted: 12/13/2025 11:46:00 AM
How Do I Navigate To The Premium Members Page
Date Posted: 10/13/2025 7:46:00 AM
Poetry Soups 20th Anniversary
Date Posted: 2/27/2025 8:45:00 PM
Jack Ellison's Journey Is Remarkable
Date Posted: 2/12/2025 11:16:00 PM
Bidding Brian Strand Farewell
Date Posted: 5/28/2024 4:20:00 PM
Super Bowl Sunday-2024
Date Posted: 2/11/2024 7:24:00 AM
Maui's Wild Fire Should Be A Lesson For All
Date Posted: 8/13/2023 8:49:00 AM
To Memphis From Above
Date Posted: 1/30/2023 7:03:00 AM
The War In Ukraine
Date Posted: 7/26/2022 2:42:00 AM
Elvis Presley Once Had Wind In His Sails
Date Posted: 7/5/2022 1:06:00 AM
Please Don't Drink And Drive
Date Posted: 6/28/2022 1:34:00 PM
Memorial Day 2022-A tribute
Date Posted: 5/30/2022 4:39:00 PM
Coronavirus Needs To Hit The Wall
Date Posted: 1/10/2022 6:13:00 PM
Look Up To The Blue Skies
Date Posted: 7/19/2021 7:13:00 AM
To Those That Take The High Road-Updated with noted
Date Posted: 4/11/2021 8:11:00 PM
The Rearing Twenties
Date Posted: 2/18/2021 7:06:00 AM
Dark Day in US History
Date Posted: 1/6/2021 1:02:00 PM
Say Good Riddance To 2020
Date Posted: 12/28/2020 7:15:00 AM
Sally's Halloween Dance
Date Posted: 10/31/2020 7:31:00 PM
A Blossom Fell From The Sky In The Form Of Louise Gluck
Date Posted: 10/9/2020 8:10:00 AM
The Field Of Dreams Is Life
Date Posted: 7/8/2020 2:17:00 PM
A Snake In The Grass Took George Floyd
Date Posted: 6/2/2020 6:39:00 AM

My Photos


photo
Get a Premium Membership
Turn off ads, get more exposure for your poetry, and get more features with a Premium Membership.
Book: Diverse Voices: The Poetry of Human Rights and the Pursuit of Peace