Which Came First

Who would argue about which came first, regeneratively intelligent design, or a decomposing degenerating natural Earth? No one. To do so is too patently absurd, when we choose to see these two not only as oppositional cause-effect, but also as appositional dipolar co-arising balance of regenerative information tacitly implied within decomposing energetic balance. The very idea that either regenerating purpose or degenerating nature could originally, foundationally, come one before the other appears and feels anti-ecological, like choosing WinLose degenerative static being over WinWin positive equals double-binding negative deviant regenerative/degenerative co-arising toward further multi-generational co-becoming.