Gerald Dillenbeck | + Follow Poet |
Political Verse | + Fav Poem | Comment | Email | Print |

Thomas Jefferson

It interests me to peer past the drafting
and rewriting shoulder
of Thomas Jefferson,
unhappy slave-owner,
and John Adams,
with domestic slave-owner nuisance issues,
and other principle writing minds 
of original democratic declaration and constitution shaping times,
as they listened to their own ecopolitically experienced histories,
some with fear and anger-mongering slave-owners,
some as not so much, thanks but,
not really quite OK for me
and my family,
morally,
and ethically
and perhaps even patriotic democratically speaking
for all human trusting and co-investing natures 
created with equal sacred dignity.

Jefferson wrestles with personal political empower
or disempowerment,
economic and ecological
co-arising a national-forming issue:

How can we allow buying and selling of human nature and souls
and what does that imply with regard to controlling things we might specifically state
as a right of citizenship
for all multicultural people yet to arrive
as newer immigrants of alien,
and often people of sovereign color majorities
and non-Western non-European states
and diverse religious and cultural territories?

So, rights of citizenship
are also encitizenship rights going forward:
Rights of free speech and assembly: 
except slaves, 
and probably women, need not apply, as of this writing.

Sorry.

Personally,
speaking just for my Thomas Jefferson self,
I'm not comfortable with this,
but, this was the best John Adams and I could work out
that the Red SlaveOwner States were willing to invest in
for long-term democratic growth and health and happiness
and prosperity outcomes.

Rights to own and carry, transport weapons,
ballistic or otherwise,
including the fully military-industrialized capitalistic Win/Lose economic presumptions
of the NRA,
which, well, OK,
both M-I monoculturing capitalism and the NRA don't exist yet,
but I can see where this is going,
and it looks like uncivil war 
all over again
this right to bear arms,
guns,
and sharp instruments,
swords,
knives,
shanks,
ummm...

Oh, right?
Grenades and automatic rifles of course,
and probably tanks and Hummers too,
but certainly slaves, and probably women, need not apply
for all lives matter eco-citizenship,
much less rights of religious freedom,

Because my zealous self-righteous Red State Constitutional Brothers
are only co-investing in enslavement
to a Win slave-owners,
Lose-slaves,
compromised ecopolitical outcome
despite my own
Original Democratic Constitutional Intent!

Dear John,

Thanks for reading the above,
and thanks also for not commenting on it.

I just needed to vent
about who's going to sort out
remaining dissonance
about rights of capitalistic ownership
currently monopolized by white male property owners
and remaining rights to own human nature
for economic supremacy gain
despite a RightBrain Matriotic suppressive
recessive
depressive
frame of lost and imbalanced unhealthy 
natural-spiritual enlightened mind.

Thanks for listening.
I'm feeling a lot of dissonance about this.
Some issues here on the home-front.

Anyway,
I'm also about to send you the final draft you asked for.

Warm Enlightenment 
Philosophical-Intellectual
and Profoundly Patriotic Regards,

Thomas ReStorative EcoPolitical ReCreationist Jefferson

Dear Thomas,

Take a pill.
Or, better yet,
there is a Georgian State Representative who,
in about 250 years from now,
will suggest you would be doing your patriotic duty
if you stopped taking your pills,
so maybe...
No, I'm sure you're not popping pills,
it's just the alcohol, right?

Do you even drink?
I can't remember.

Anyway,
I just want to remind you
that not only do we have considerable personal investments
in this whole patriotic USA democracy experiment working out
for the next several generations,
but so do all those white guys
whose primary current property values
are, in unfortunate fact, their slaves,
and their potential to feed and breed more
for agricultural and domestic economic,
yet not quite so sacred ecological,
LeftBrain dominant Political Traditions
and reasons,
and yet feelings of dissonance,
and uncomfortable excuses,
and lack of curiosity and interest and co-investment,
and neglect of co-empathic Sacred RightBrain consciousness development,
about what remains ecologically and matriotically healthy,
and what is fake anti-healthcare giving and anti-redemptively receiving
weedish monoculturalism,
religious totalitarianism
replete with anti-patriotic Win/Lose pathologies.

So,
we sink apart
or swim together
ecopolitically speaking,
if you see what I mean.

Thank you,
in advance,
for preparing our final draft,
doing the best we can
in here with now RealTime.

With Warming Economic and Political Climates in Mind,
John CoInvested Negotiator Adams

RE: The current co-investments due
to actually give birth to this Win/Lose compromise
toward Win/Win Promised MotherLands
for future Farmer Adams,
Left with RightBrain speaking.

Perhaps we can add a Conclusion:

To future multiculturing generations 
we could not squeeze sufficient trust in here
and now:

So, the rest is for you to decide,
toward universal healthcare democracy of cooperative Left with Right ownership
and multiculturally co-equivalent governance,

Or still burning-out with LeftBrain dominance,
EitherSecularLeft-OrSacredRight
as RedState MonoCulturing Yang-Dominant Win/Lose
toward Lose/Lose long-term degenerativity
of all Earth's un-reborn alien and pagan sinners,
who would be better off as slaves
of rightwing fake-christians,
heterosexual white males strongly preferred,
thanks so much.

Or,
Win-Win
CoInvested Planters and Trust Harvesters,
expanding Constitutions 
for growing Health-Wealth Democracies
.

Copyright © Gerald Dillenbeck | Year Posted 2017

Please Login to post a comment