On Therapeutic Sciences

The academic position that political science becomes too didactic for scientific neutrality when political scientists are too pro-democracy v theocracy, plutocracy, etc. too cooperatively enthusiastic about economic health, too positive about empathic trust as our ecopolitical vocational polypath toward politically inclusive healthy hope and faith and love advocacy, Are unlikely to also take the position that therapeutic and medicinal sciences best remain neutral about health v pathology, at least when it comes to investing in our own egocentric health insurance, safety, security, defense. The idea of scientific neutrality taking the position that terrorists and fascists and racists, and other forms of rabid monoculturalism, are political-choice neutral about effective powers of climate governance evaporates when the scientist is choosing residential community and family economy and national climate of personal preference. Exception to this rule might be political scientists who enjoy teaching macho-tyranny within their own homes and not-so-extended families. Objective political health standards are explored and discovered through subjective neutrality and yet nihilism is not a preferred ecopolitical outcome, as if we must not know enough to get out of a totalitarian reign. I look forward within this postmillennial time, when one could hardly become an effective political evolutionary scientist or healthy public policy designer of climate therapies or become an actually nominated and elected-selected legislator, CEO, governor of self and others, judge or jurist, outside a litmus test commitment to LeftBrain DNA with Elder RightBrain RNA co-intelligent design of healthy fractal-fertile bio- and ecosystems, co-empathic nondual trust in dialectal therapeutic political merits of multicultural Basic Attendance, steeped in polypathic waters of radically cooperative eco-normative consciousness.