On Therapeutic Sciences

I am aware we have a growing conservative academic position that political science becomes too didactic for scientific neutrality when political scientists are too pro-liberating democracy v pro status-quo theocracy, plutocracy, autocracy, kleptocracy, etc. too delusionally enthusiastic about economic and sociological and neurological health meritocracy too positive about win/win co-empathic trust as our best and brightest eco-political polypath toward subjectively advocating for: polytheistic/monotheistic co-liberating faith polyculturally positive hope and resonantly polyphonic love. It does seem that this conservative political skepticism bites the liberal education system that has fed them, put probably uncontaminated food on their deregulation tables, paid their gated suburban mortgages. As conservative academic views Trumpian turn toward military-industrialized advocacy of second amendments to a better dead than not-red constitution for national corporate monoculturing greed and irreligiously anthropocentric monotheism I nervously notice that patriarchal conservation of straight-western-white corporate monocultural colonizing traditions have become rather too comfortable with a disempowering and unenlightened monstrous win/lose 0-sum evolutionary survival hypothesis that therapeutic and medicinal sciences best remain neutral about climates and cultures of healthcare, compassionate kindness, and neurosystemic win/win peace, while growing rabidly dissociative tolerance for conserving anthro-entitled pathologies such as divesting of international healthcare environmental safety secure and effective home and life prosperity and vaccinated domestic defense systems. My idea of scientific neutrality takes a Positive Psychology position that terrorism and fascism and racism, like narcissism and anthropocentrism and nihilism and monoculturing patriarchal anti-feminism and monopolistic winner takes all capitalism And other forms of neurosystemic and ecosystemic trauma, no longer seem political-choice neutral about effective and healthy governance when conservative educators and advocates are choosing peaceful and non-toxic residential climates and cooperative family co-investment economies and federal/state cooperative tax revenue associations. Exceptions to this win/win co-governance golden rule might be political and economic scientists who enjoy teaching while parenting macho-tyranny within their own troubling autocratic fear- and anger-mongering homes plutocratically gated neighborhoods dysfunctional polarized school boards and disturbing town non-dialogical non-councils. Truly objective political health standards can be explored and discovered through subjective neutrality and yet conclude that nihilism is not an effective neurosystemic governance strategy just as denialism cannot achieve efficient ecosystemic stewardship capacity. I look forward to a more cooperatively graced co-intelligent bicameral meritocracy nominating and electing and rewarding and preferentially selecting effective democratic healthcare scientists co-passionate policy designers religious and public sector leaders of polyculturing inside/outside climate therapies Having win/win engaged bipartisan kindness isn't win/lose apartisan meanness, and presented a well-documented commitment to co-empathic liberating-mind/conserving-body nondual trust in therapeutic evolutionary merits (not devolutionary demerits) of neurosystemic co-operative enlightening and ecosystemic empowering woke up consciousness.