I Scrutinize Myself As Case Study

(alternately titled - today's lesson iz addressing categorical imperative) Courtesy of unpleasant he ping diatribes visited me from eldest offspring ugh gree guss vituperations, doth force me to admit (and take key lock, stock, and barrel lamentations to heart), that she (Eden Liat) didst perceive (hence nee), interpret as her reality regarding my actions, intents, words, et cetera men knee instances of objectionable dealing with situations of mine mien to thyself (lamely, meekly, and nervously pleading being oblivious), nonetheless purportedly untoward fatherly behavior, said kin recoils in reaction to extremely re: pulse sieve, no matter, whether paternal behavior of mine unintentional (see ming lee) find ding total unawareness as poor excuse, which does not hold candle box three doors down, nor bankable, dutiful guarantee hence this papa, heed decree, his displeasing, now accepting onerous task of child rearing inflicted hurtful affects asper, mismanaging challenges as legal guardian, and thus grievously, honestly, and readily attests averse to hold a mirror be fore my person as proof positive aware ness, and accept, how I usurped carte blanche (parental role, no matter honest intentions, sans welfare of daughters) unknowingly shamefacedly interpreted as unflattering about me whom willy nilly bandied authoritarian free reign (and/or rein) recounting mine foibles, viz despite my best intentions, impressions, and iterations as even handed sues err un tee I mint jewel lip succoring (suzerainty) spurring the conundrum, que who, what, and how does one pre sent lee define true intentions, and whether neutral stance can be cree jewel less lee codifies, si?