Login
|
Join PoetrySoup
Home
Submit Poems
Login
Sign Up
Member Home
My Poems
My Quotes
My Profile & Settings
My Inboxes
My Outboxes
Soup Mail
Contest Results/Status
Contests
Poems
Poets
Famous Poems
Famous Poets
Dictionary
Types of Poems
Quotes
Short Stories
Articles
Forum
Blogs
Poem of the Day
New Poems
Resources
Syllable Counter
Anthology
Grammar Check
Greeting Card Maker
Classifieds
Member Area
Member Home
My Profile and Settings
My Poems
My Quotes
My Short Stories
My Articles
My Comments Inboxes
My Comments Outboxes
Soup Mail
Poetry Contests
Contest Results/Status
Followers
Poems of Poets I Follow
Friend Builder
Soup Social
Poetry Forum
New/Upcoming Features
The Wall
Soup Facebook Page
Who is Online
Link to Us
Member Poems
Poems - Top 100 New
Poems - Top 100 All-Time
Poems - Best
Poems - by Topic
Poems - New (All)
Poems - New (PM)
Poems - New by Poet
Poems - Random
Poems - Read
Poems - Unread
Member Poets
Poets - Best New
Poets - New
Poets - Top 100 Most Poems
Poets - Top 100 Most Poems Recent
Poets - Top 100 Community
Poets - Top 100 Contest
Famous Poems
Famous Poems - African American
Famous Poems - Best
Famous Poems - Classical
Famous Poems - English
Famous Poems - Haiku
Famous Poems - Love
Famous Poems - Short
Famous Poems - Top 100
Famous Poets
Famous Poets - Living
Famous Poets - Most Popular
Famous Poets - Top 100
Famous Poets - Best
Famous Poets - Women
Famous Poets - African American
Famous Poets - Beat
Famous Poets - Cinquain
Famous Poets - Classical
Famous Poets - English
Famous Poets - Haiku
Famous Poets - Hindi
Famous Poets - Jewish
Famous Poets - Love
Famous Poets - Metaphysical
Famous Poets - Modern
Famous Poets - Punjabi
Famous Poets - Romantic
Famous Poets - Spanish
Famous Poets - Suicidal
Famous Poets - Urdu
Famous Poets - War
Poetry Resources
Anagrams
Bible
Book Store
Character Counter
Cliché Finder
Poetry Clichés
Common Words
Copyright Information
Grammar
Grammar Checker
Homonym
Homophones
How to Write a Poem
Lyrics
Love Poem Generator
New Poetic Forms
Plagiarism Checker
Poetics
Poetry Art
Publishing
Random Word Generator
Spell Checker
Store
What is Good Poetry?
Word Counter
Email Poem
Your IP Address: 18.222.147.4
Your Email Address:
Required
Email Address Not Valid.
To Email Address:
Email Address Not Valid.
Required
Subject
Required
Personal Note:
Poem Title:
Poem
So, if I understand correctly, you want to respond to inevitable energy descent by upgrading incentives for cooperative communication, positive information expansion, research and regenerative design, implementation, and ecopolitical evaluation strategies? Yes, because we achieved current WinWin cooperative communication and organic networking capacities by virtue of investment advances through recent past patriarchal dominant cultures drawing down slow-grown renewable sources of energy, especially oil and gas coal and trees, these having emerged over multiple millennial investments of time, stories told in ergodic rhythm languages of Earth, fire, yin-waterscapes and yang-climate atmospheres creating lungs for co-respiring systems and bicameral hearts for communicating nutritional feedback systems, and stomachs for competitive and cooperative digestive exchange systems, and capital-investing minds for creating cooperative political empowering tools and languages and ecosystems. Wow, that covered a lot of polyculturing outcomes! Now, if we could come back down to Mother Earth, and not quite so deeply lost within your nutritional ecology, for our conversation today. Could you say more about what you mean by cooperative v competitive invested communication? Are regenerative research design strategies your suggested ecopolitical application for more positive communication? We have developed diverse frames for dipolar cooperative outcome farming among more competitively complex survival relationships. Systems theory speaks of whole interdependent co-arising networks (and thereby also dualdark co-gravitating) of mutual subsidiary alliance, within a concave matriarchal, reverse-hierarchical lattice architecture co-empowering sub-networks of cooperative communication. Then, too, we have Closed System patriarchal Business As Capitalism Usual. We also see these dipolar contrasts across a co-arising spectrum in Process Theology and Game Theory, where WinWin continues regenerative play across relational transactions, while WinLose competitions of self more and others less are rooted more in patriarchal capitalism's misunderstandings of Earth's most regenerate revolutions rooted in Mother Earth's nutritionally nurtured Golden Rule. Again, I'm not sure that responded to my question about cooperative v competitive communication, especially in this context of self-perpetuating deep learning. Well then, I'm not cooperating very well am I? Let's see, maybe an example. Let's imagine you are the original creator of language. Your job is to research the function of things, and the energy flow of relationships, to invent, as inclusively as possible, some sounds and actions that become nouns and verbs and prepositions and then, too, some adjectives and nuancing adverbs, and especially some exclamations to communicate cooperatively about when shit happens, as it will, but also when grace happens, as Earth unfolds spacetime in four equivalent dimensions, an thereby must enfold concave dualdark (0)-sum ergodic patterns of co-intelligent DNA-RNA balance. So, my vocation is not just to unilaterally invent polynomial labels but also to find out what my family and friends could effectively reproduce as mutually nutritional information? Yes, verbal sounds and nonverbal actions for equivalent health v pathology meanings between extended families of multiculturing species, thereby growing positive exegetical communication, and not just adding further eisegetical Towers of Babel multicultural communication and concomitant economic and political empowerment/disempowerment problems, more than polypathically regenerative co-empowerment. So we look and listen together for cooperative resolutions already in use, and we notice historical relationships between siblings first, then between generations of siblings next, on out to include all animated objects, in process of becoming history's polynomial network of subjects. Time unfolds bilaterally and binomially and multi-generationally, where new-yin grows old-yang grows new-yin. Every polynomial generation seems to have not just our spoken nomial deductive labels, but also a setting apart from it's organic hypostatic understory. Every polynomial includes an implied binomially interdependent cognitive relationship with Earth's other causes and Earth's oncoming multiculturing nutritionally cooperative and toxically competing effects. Am I communicating this regenerative co-designing WinWin cooperative ecopolitical game yet? I'm not sure your example helped your cooperative intent. But, we are nearly out of time... No, that can't be. Perhaps we're merely running out of mutual highest priority time for co-investment in this particular direction, for now. I stand corrected. No need to stand. Keep spiraling around our subject in your reiterative back to (0)-sum zoning in way, helping us stay on our cooperative target. Anyway, perhaps you could give an example of how we might upgrade incentives for cooperative communication, both verbal and nonverbal. To incentivize YinRight matriarchal equivalence, give prejudicial weight to WinWin as our default cooperative strategy for research and policy development and framing ancient WinLose polarized issues between yang secular deductivity and yin sacred inductivity. Cooperatively regenerate communicators more than competitively WinLeft-LoseRight degenerators. That was an example or a principle? Pay more for cooperative investment, and charge less interest for co-investment. Charge higher interest and autonomous user fees for persons, including corporations who would continue competitively disinvesting away from climate and landscape ego/ecotherapies. Yes, it feels to me like we have communicated for future positive relationships for us. How about you? Where would you place this interview on your energy-giving v energy-receiving scale? Where WinWin is (0)-sum balance giving at least as good as Golden Rule receiving.
CAPTCHA Preview
Type the characters you see in the picture
Required