The Jewish Man of War

The Jewish Man of War Jesus was a pacifist, this we are told, And that’s the story that’s been sold. Some of the names surrounding his cause, Demonstrate behavior to give this pause. Simon Zelotes is one of the names, That give us the reality of these aims. Zelotes means zealot, and these men wanted, To kill the Romans and were undaunted, About wanting the violent overthrow, And giving the Romans their final death blow. And Judas Iscariot is another of these, Whose name was altered only to please, The masses who wanted Jesus as a pacifist, But had to disguise this violent activist. Sicariot means “dagger man”, with their own crusades. Those who killed Romans with hidden blades. And the name Iscariot has always been, An unknown issue and believers chagrin. Now we come the the Gethsemane garden, Where Simon Peter gets a full pardon, For lopping off a Roman’s ear, And doing so without much fear. But attacking a Roman soldier was a major crime, And you’d be killed in a very quick time. But Peter got to live his life, And entered not his afterlife. But there’s more to this tale that causes worry. Carrying a sword would cause a scurry. A sword was strictly a weapon of war, Carried by Romans whom the Jews did abhor. But seemingly here not unusual at all And would have resulted in Peter’s downfall Making this entire incident a complete oddball. Finally the men on both sides of Jesus, On their crosses, both quite grievous, Were not thieves as the tale is told. No one was crucified for steeling some gold. The only reason one hung on a cross, Was insurrection against Rome and and not the gloss, That they were thieves being killed For common crimes that they fulfilled. So with this reality, we should agree, The story is not what they claim it to be. Jesus was not the Prince of Peace But a rebel Romans could not release.