Scientific Generalists
I was listening to a scientific historian
interviewed on National Public Radio.
I probably didn't hear her correctly,
But I thought she said
Human bicameral nature
is Nature-Generalist Win/Lose deductive
reductive LeftBrain evolutionary health
And HumanNature is EcoHabitat Specialist WinWin,
inductive integral RightBrain
revolutionary co-acclimating wealth
balancing personal productions
with ecopolitically cooperative consumptions.
This is in direct contrast with all other species,
Deductive nutritional predators
are Generalists
more WinWin co-evolutionists
while resting on full cooperative stomachs
And Special Survivalists
during Special Cases
WinLose revolutionists
only when WinWin transparent extractive
CommonGround agreements
are temporarily not accessible.
I'm not totally clear yet
what this implies
if you are, like me,
choking on WinLose rhetoric
when WinWin healthy choices
remain Generalist SpiritNature
inductive/deductive co-arisingly unexplored.
Somewhere between WinLose evolutionary theories
and WinWin revolutionary transparency
between secular predators
and sacred nurture prayers
I might General Nature/Nurture
transparently suppose.
Post Comments
Poetrysoup is an environment of encouragement and growth so only provide specific positive comments that indicate what you appreciate about the poem. Negative comments will result your account being banned.
Please
Login
to post a comment
Turn off ads, get more exposure for your poetry, and get more features with a
Premium Membership.
