L Milton Hankins Poet Rhyme

Modern Debate

Some of our finest literary writing
Is found in rebuttal and debate
Especially when it is logical, reasoned,
Well-written, or cogently spoken
Like writings of Madison and Paine
And speeches of Lincoln and Douglas
Too often, these days, anger prevails
Striking as if with a sharp cutlass
What, I wonder, is to be the gain?
Taking a position for a token …
To gain notice for a season …
I have especially noticed of late
That debate seems more like fighting.

written January 20, 2022
[poem is composed using my reverse
rhyme scheme abcdef/g/fedcba

♡Like0

Share Poem

---

Post Comments

Poetrysoup is an environment of encouragement and growth so only provide specific positive comments that indicate what you appreciate about the poem. Negative comments will result your account being banned.

Please Login to post a comment

Caren Krutsinger January 22, 2022 at 9:59 AM And herein lies much of the problem "Too often, these days, anger prevails" and the division. L Milton Hankins January 22, 2022 at 10:11 AM Yep. There was a time, I think, when cooler heads prevailed. How much of this is provoked because people in power have such easy access to media and public reaction?

Shirley Hawkins January 21, 2022 at 10:58 PM Debating can be progressive. Arguing is regressive. Enjoyed the read, Thank you Milt. L Milton Hankins January 22, 2022 at 9:10 AM Shirley, I always appreciate your thoughts and love reading your comment. Thanks!

Rico Leffanta January 21, 2022 at 10:42 AM Debates are now scripted by speechwriters rather than planners? I don't hear much said about realistic consequences and alternatives . . . .Aloha! Rico Leffanta January 22, 2022 at 10:19 AM We are not all that certain Trump can even read . . . .(or comprehends what he can read) L Milton Hankins January 21, 2022 at 12:17 PM A lot of truth to your observation, Rico. Apparently whoever scripted the last Trump-Biden debate couldn't put many words in Trump's brain!

Gershon Wolf January 20, 2022 at 6:14 PM For sure. For certain. I intentionally watched the first Kennedy-Nixon debate (from 1960) on YouTube the same night as one of the Trump-Clinton farces back in 2016. The difference was (and is) jaw-dropping. Kennedy and Nixon really came prepared. Trump-Clinton was like Bozo slugging it out with Raggedy Ann. ~ gw L Milton Hankins January 20, 2022 at 6:55 PM Oh, I remember it well, gw. I, too, watched the Kennedy-Nixon debate, and although I voted for Mr. Nixon, I knew, after those debates, Kennedy would be our next president. Somehow, I think it was meant to work out as it did.

Maurice Rigoler January 20, 2022 at 2:59 PM So true, Miton. It's one reason I rarely listen to political debates, unless Trump is one of the debaters - he's always good for laughs. / Maurice. Also I like your reverse rhyme scheme. L Milton Hankins January 20, 2022 at 3:01 PM Aw thanks, Maurice. I have discovered I've been writing in that pattern for many years, more than I realized. I'm not sure there's anything unique about it, but I also tend to pronounce words and sentences backwards. I suppose we are all a bit weird in some respects, eh?

Paulette Calasibetta January 20, 2022 at 1:54 PM Yes, long ago there was dignity in debate, today it seems there is no debate, just a vocal brawl. :)Paulette L Milton Hankins January 20, 2022 at 2:10 PM Indeed, Paulette. I'm afraid the day of reasoned argument is over. The prevailing attitude is if you don't agree with me, then you are flat-out wrong! In my opinion that attitude generates garbage.

Andrea Dietrich January 20, 2022 at 1:22 PM Yes in the old days debate could be so fun but people are very sensitive today and not listening to any side but their own any more. I like your examples of Lincoln and the others. Lincoln was one of the greatest of orators, writers and debaters. L Milton Hankins January 20, 2022 at 2:21 PM Indeed, and sadly so, Andrea. I always grew with criticism. Perhaps others, not so much.

John Lawless January 20, 2022 at 1:11 PM er,,,if you don't take the bait then you won't have to debate the merits of "de-bait". I remember counseling several students that were on the "debating" team that before they entered the debate they should know more about the oppositions position than they did. L Milton Hankins January 20, 2022 at 2:20 PM So true. I can remember handing out the same advice when judging forensics. In fact, you stand more chance of winning a debate if you know more about the oppositions' position than you do your own. Strange, but true. And, always assume the opponent will know more about your position than you think they do! Thanks, John.