We Are All Angry

No, Speaker Ryan, you do not speak for me of the sacred probabilities for growing civil kindness. I respect your mind and your feelings, but we are not, as you assert, all angry. In fact, some of us think it is a bad, sad, and mad idea to try to develop healthy and equitable policies for Others out of personal anger and political fear, when we could choose motivations engaging cooperative love, restorative justice, compassionate communication and internal/external peace-making. I am sorry you are angry, but please do not project your concerns about lack of viable health and safety outcomes onto win/win-motivated me And millions of others who believe that green unconditional warm compassion is not only more resonantly kind but also more resiliently healthy than red anger and dark blue fear of traumatic loss. Both political and environmental scientists can explain why monoculturally rabid win/lose 0-sum predative environments are unlikely to evolve therapeutically stable regenerative resolutions toward healthy sustainable nutritionally rich and multicultural win/win co-empowerment outcomes for you, and me, and we, and Earth Polarizing anger is unlikely to produce deep economic ecological healthy relationships and wide poli-cultural love communion with AnthroCreator God, or with awesome messianic EnLightenment, or with EarthPower's indigenous bodhisattva wisdom, much less all bilaterally intelligent three Worshipped, celebrated, legislated, governed not with militarized PTSD anger or polarized fear-mongering stress or unfree, costly hate speech But eating with joyful humility and drinking with open, trust-developing curiosity producing Left-cognitive and consuming Right-intuitive compassionate neurosystemic communication SunLight liberating messiahs and EarthPower conserving bodhisattvas Fruit of resilient transgenerational sacred passion/organic pleasure, EgoMind v EcoBody chronic trauma-informed AnthroCrown/EarthRoot BiPartisan CommunioNations.