Exclusion Rule

HE STOOD IN FRONT
OF PEOPLE WHO THOUGHT
OF HIM AS BEING RIGHT
IN THIS TIME
AND RIGHT IN ALL TIMES
THAT HIS POSITION AGAINST
POEMGRINNING WAS RIGHT
AND THOSE WHO OPPOSSED
THIS POSITION WAS/ WERE WRONG.
THE LEFT THE DEFINTION OF
POEMGRINNING OPEN, AND ALLOWED
THOSE WHO OPPOSSED CERTAIN POETS
TO TAKE POSITION AGAINST THEIR WORKS.
AND TO CITE DIFFERENCES AND SAMENESS'
AMONG THE WORKS OF THESE WRITERS.
THEN ONE STOOD AND SAID,
THAT BEYOND THE SCOPE OF WORDS, AND IN THE 
EXPRESSION OF THE AUTHERS INTENT.  
MIGHT THE RIGHTS OF THESE POETS BE CONTESTED
AND THE VEIWS OF THIS PANEL CHANGED
THAT THESE VEIWS ARE WRONG IN THESE TIMES
AS THEY WERE WRONG IN THOSE TIMES.
MIGHT THE EXPRESSIONS AND GOODWILL
OF PEOPLE HAVE MERCY ON YOUR
DISCRIPTIVE SOULS!       

THEY TOLD THEM TO CHANGE THEIR LYRICS OR THE POET'S SOCEITY WOULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR THERE WORKS TO BE PUBLLISHED!
A STORY OF GAMM'S AND GRINNING!
Copyright © | Year Posted 2018

Poem

Post Comments

Poetrysoup is an environment of encouragement and growth so only provide specific positive comments that indicate what you appreciate about the poem. Negative comments will result your account being banned.

Please Login to post a comment

Terry Avatar
December 12, 2018 at 2:48 PM
who chants to the echo's, might the sounds reflect the song? to be hear in the etchings, than audiences might hear this song.
Get a Premium Membership
Turn off ads, get more exposure for your poetry, and get more features with a Premium Membership.
Book: Diverse Voices: The Poetry of Human Rights and the Pursuit of Peace