Exclusion Rule

HE STOOD IN FRONT OF PEOPLE WHO THOUGHT OF HIM AS BEING RIGHT IN THIS TIME AND RIGHT IN ALL TIMES THAT HIS POSITION AGAINST POEMGRINNING WAS RIGHT AND THOSE WHO OPPOSSED THIS POSITION WAS/ WERE WRONG. THE LEFT THE DEFINTION OF POEMGRINNING OPEN, AND ALLOWED THOSE WHO OPPOSSED CERTAIN POETS TO TAKE POSITION AGAINST THEIR WORKS. AND TO CITE DIFFERENCES AND SAMENESS' AMONG THE WORKS OF THESE WRITERS. THEN ONE STOOD AND SAID, THAT BEYOND THE SCOPE OF WORDS, AND IN THE EXPRESSION OF THE AUTHERS INTENT. MIGHT THE RIGHTS OF THESE POETS BE CONTESTED AND THE VEIWS OF THIS PANEL CHANGED THAT THESE VEIWS ARE WRONG IN THESE TIMES AS THEY WERE WRONG IN THOSE TIMES. MIGHT THE EXPRESSIONS AND GOODWILL OF PEOPLE HAVE MERCY ON YOUR DISCRIPTIVE SOULS! THEY TOLD THEM TO CHANGE THEIR LYRICS OR THE POET'S SOCEITY WOULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR THERE WORKS TO BE PUBLLISHED! A STORY OF GAMM'S AND GRINNING!