In the blender don't confuse or misuse Aristotelian logic with Boolean logic. If there is existential import does the mind comport or contort logic? Do we go down the path of math or do we cogit philosophical logic? Boolean’s objects neglects existence just because the math works doesn't mean something exists. It begs the question. Numbers don't lie, neither does the blue in the sky. The infliction of contradictions in a non-universal is an abstraction, and an abstraction is something not extended in space. We have the standard forms or deductive markers: the letters A,E,I,O. In the word Aff[I]rmo, (the A and I are the affirmative) and in nEgO (the E and O are the negation) in presuppositional logic.
"For I would that ye knew what great conflict I have for you, and for them at Laodicea, and for as many as have not seen my face in the flesh; That their hearts might be comforted, being knit together in love, and unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding, to the acknowledgement of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ: In Whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge." Colossians 2:1-3
The answer to the last question of the poem is: (and by our reason resting on our faith we believe what God has said as truth) “And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” Genesis 2:16-17