Free online greeting card maker or poetry art generator. Create free custom printable greeting cards or art from photos and text online. Use PoetrySoup's free online software to make greeting cards from poems, quotes, or your own words. Generate memes, cards, or poetry art for any occasion; weddings, anniversaries, holidays, etc (See examples here). Make a card to show your loved one how special they are to you. Once you make a card, you can email it, download it, or share it with others on your favorite social network site like Facebook. Also, you can create shareable and downloadable cards from poetry on PoetrySoup. Use our poetry search engine to find the perfect poem, and then click the camera icon to create the card or art.
Enter Title (Not Required)
Enter Poem or Quote (Required)Required Yang, dear. Yes, my lovely Yin. Why do you map Game Theory onto eco-feminist political territory? It comes across as either just confusing or, even worse, vaguely sexist. Really! How sexist? Well, you seem to associate competitive ZeroSum Win or Lose with strong aggressive patriarchal effectiveness for defending safety and conserving health Rational strategic choices for the real guts of our ego- and anthro- and national-competitive survival; while Yin is more of the nurturing optimistic Mom who has her matriarchal place in a Win and Win domestic economy, but speaking smiling nurture to authoritative competitive power sounds like patriarchally dominant Business As SexistUsual to me. I can see that, but it does miss my more encompassing Yang/Yin Win and Win nondualist intent. No Yang, not if you replace our Patriarchy or Matriarchy politically polarized territory for a Yang and Yin Win and Win map Each contrasting side co-arising respectively as Original Cause and Original CoPassionate Effect. I'm not sure I can explain why I see EcoFeminist Game Theory as nonzero-sum optimizing Win and Win and why that, in turn, unveils nature+nurture slow-growth resonance Nor why matriarchy's cooperative circles are better suited to healthy democracy as compared to patriarchy's competitive hierarchies Open to retributive punishment for being Other when Yang becomes defined by merely Anti-Yin Business \ as Patriarchal Caste-Preserving Usual When Win Yang becomes measured solely by Lose Yin zero-sum eco-politically corruptive and neurosystemically degenerative anthropocentric history Embedded within Earth's larger organic context of Yin+Yang Win+Win phylogenic development of EarthTribe's co-passion mother-story. Then why bother with it? If you can't deductively explain why feeling womanist compassion is matriarchally therapeutic then how could your way of seeing Game Theory through an eco-feminist lens actually be mentally or physically therapeutic, even for yourself, with your deductivist-reductivist abstract theories and thoughts that sacred humanity-preservation is more theologically enlightened than organic feelings empowering healthy ecological FatherSun+EarthMother Yang+Yin bipartisan cobinary primal relationships. Because I am nothing without co-arising you. As bipolar opposites, in a Win or Lose survivalist world, neither of us could be Yang strong light or Yin out-flowing power. Only in our bipartisan appositional co-arising Win+Win world of cobinary Me+We matriarchal development can we find Yang-Left AnthroMind within Yin-Right EarthMother's Body more compassionately trusting our politically bipartisan and personally bicameral healthy democratic choices more than when Yang systemically traumatizes Yin, and Yin retributively reacts, rather than restoratively responds. Maybe yes, maybe no. Your description of how Earth regenerates cooperative, more than degenerates competitive climates of AnthroCaste-preserving pathology, does not move me toward feeling resonant therapeutic passion. I was listening to a feminist writer speaking of why she is uncomfortable with being labeled as a feminist. She was clear that, for her, what feminists are against is Patriarchy, which is not the same thing as being against men. It feels essential to feminism that no feminist believes s/he can speak with useful authority about what all feminists are for. Informed by Win+Win Game Theory I suspect feminists are for nurturing healthy democratic global Yin+Yang bipartisan empowerment restoring EarthBodies with AnthroMinds filled with all Earth's OrganicTribe memories of EarthMother's iconic trans-fertility. Win+Win NonZero-Sum cooperative trust restores our larger eco-nurturing souls While Win or Lose Zero-Sum competitive mistrust survivalist choices are reserved for extraordinary trauma aversive short-term strategic necessities, to minimize personal losses; not to vengefully maximize Other's losses. Tell me again why you are so sure Win+Win cooperative equivalence is matriarchal Earth's deeper therapeutic story, while Win or Lose is Patriarchy's more AnthroCaste supremacy's high and mighty monotheistic tragedy. Let's try this: Anatol Rapaport's regenerative-reproductive-reiterative longevity within a game environment permitting both Win or Lose competitive, and Win+Win cooperative bilateral choices called Tit for Tat, always wins every game played, every transaction co-invested, everyrelationship mirror-passioned Only choosing MeWin so TheyLose when a specific known Other has played MeWin so YouLose in most recent prior history of personal experience. Corollary: Never defensively initiate WinMe to LoseThey. If your default setting is always choose Win+Win equivalency, except when unavoidaly engaging a prior MeWin or OtherWins 0-sum player. If everyone chooses Win+Win equivalency every day in every eco-political game and relationship, then WinMore to LoseLess monopolistic players are no longer culturally reinforced as neurosystemically or ecosystemically normative. NonZero Game Theory, enlightened and empowered Win+Win bilateral choice-making default feels Both-And RightBrain pleasing resonance where Zero-Sum Win or Lose choices are Either-Or LeftBrain dispassionate dissonance So, Yin+Yang NonZero-Sum healthy bipartisan democracy passionately and pleasantly plays most matriarchally regenerative deepest and widest and longest? And that's what AnthroMind+EarthBody co-empowering Muses share with Yang AntiPatriarchal EcoFeminists. Yin+Yang, not quite so much Yang or Yin, democratic health and safety restorative peace-making. Well, Yang honey, just turn your map around, so Y/Y Matriarchs are, as they always have been, Original CoArising Causes, after all we do carry the regenerative babies, while the Patriarchs are just another pair of Yin or Yang X or Y +1 or -0 Original CoGravitating Effects. Isn't that a little like interpreting the teleological intent of Democratizing Constitutions, as Originally Caused by our ForeFather's Mothers? I doubt those who signed these cooperative intentions for humanity's health and safety also intended to bite the wombs that embryo-fed them. That does seem rabidly Lose+Lose unlikely, now that you mention Original FatherSun+EarthMother sacredly enlightening organically empowered cobinary Causes.
Enter Author Name (Not Required)