I Do I Will I Have
How wise I am to have instructed the butler
to instruct the first footman to instruct the second
footman to instruct the doorman to order my carriage;
I am about to volunteer a definition of marriage.
Just as I know that there are two Hagens, Walter and Copen,
I know that marriage is a legal and religious alliance entered
into by a man who can't sleep with the window shut and a
woman who can't sleep with the window open.
Moreover, just as I am unsure of the difference between
flora and fauna and flotsam and jetsam,
I am quite sure that marriage is the alliance of two people
one of whom never remembers birthdays and the other
never forgetsam,
And he refuses to believe there is a leak in the water pipe or
the gas pipe and she is convinced she is about to asphyxiate
or drown,
And she says Quick get up and get my hairbrushes off the
windowsill, it's raining in, and he replies Oh they're all right,
it's only raining straight down.
That is why marriage is so much more interesting than divorce,
Because it's the only known example of the happy meeting of
the immovable object and the irresistible force.
So I hope husbands and wives will continue to debate and
combat over everything debatable and combatable,
Because I believe a little incompatibility is the spice of life,
particularly if he has income and she is pattable.
Literary Analysis
This literary analysis was generated with AI and may contain interpretive differences. Provide your analysis in the comments section.
Summary
Ogden Nash presents marriage as a comic battlefield of manners, habits, and stubborn personalities. The poem begins with an exaggerated display of social hierarchy, as if the narrator's authority and self-importance are part of the joke, and then shifts into a mock-definition of marriage that mixes bureaucratic precision with domestic absurdity. Instead of offering romance as an ideal, Nash describes married life as a series of mismatches: one partner is careful where the other is careless, one sees danger everywhere, and the other waves it away.
The poem's progression depends on increasingly lively examples of incompatibility. Nash moves from general definition to specific household quarrels, building toward the claim that marriage is more interesting than divorce because it keeps opposites in motion together. The central meaning is not that marriage is harmonious, but that its energy comes from friction. At the same time, the poem keeps a playful tension alive: it celebrates disagreement while also exposing the self-serving assumptions behind male-female roles and social convention. The final wit suggests both affection and blunt practicality, making marriage sound less like a sacred union than a durable arrangement for surviving difference.
Theme
- Marriage as productive conflict - Nash portrays marriage as a relationship powered by disagreement rather than smooth harmony, suggesting that tension itself gives the union its liveliness.
- Domestic comedy - Ordinary household details, from windows to pipes to birthdays, become the source of the poem's humor and reveal how marriage turns small daily issues into big dramatic scenes.
- Social satire - The opening chain of servants and the mock-formal language poke fun at status, pretension, and the habit of treating life's private realities with public importance.
- Gender difference - The poem relies on paired opposites between husband and wife, using their contrasting habits to explore the difficulties and absurdities of living together.
- Practical love - Beneath the jokes, the poem suggests that long-term partnership depends less on ideal compatibility than on tolerating irritations and making room for each other.
- Ambivalence about marriage - The poem both praises and teases marriage, capturing a relationship that is at once frustrating, comic, and oddly admirable.
Literary Devices
- Satire - Nash mocks social formality and marital cliché by describing them in overblown, pseudo-serious language that exposes their absurdity.
- Hyperbole - The poem exaggerates everything from social hierarchy to domestic disagreement, turning ordinary marital habits into comic extremes.
- Paradox - Marriage is described as a union of opposites, including the idea that the most troublesome relationship can also be the most interesting.
- Antithesis - The poem repeatedly sets one person against another, such as open versus shut, danger versus denial, and remembering versus forgetting, to emphasize difference.
- Comic definition - Nash builds humor by pretending to define marriage with precision, only to replace logic with wry examples and wordplay.
- Wordplay - Terms such as the invented or twisted phrases near the end create a playful, slippery tone that keeps the poem light even while it critiques marriage.
- Accumulation - The poem strings together one example after another, creating momentum and making the argument feel both casual and relentless.
- Irony - The poem treats a supposedly serious institution with breezy humor, and its praise of incompatibility is deliberately unexpected.
Symbolism
- The butler and footmen - These servants symbolize the elaborate social pretensions that the poem gently ridicules, especially the narrator's inflated sense of importance.
- The carriage - The carriage suggests status and performance, reinforcing the poem's opening joke about privilege and hierarchy.
- Open and shut windows - The windows symbolize domestic difference and the practical incompatibilities that make shared life both annoying and comic.
- Rain - Rain becomes a symbol of conflicting perceptions, since one partner sees a leak and disaster while the other dismisses the problem.
- Birthday forgetting - The missed birthday functions as a symbol of uneven care and memory within marriage, turning emotional neglect into a small but telling joke.
- Income - Income symbolizes the practical power that underwrites the poem's final joke, suggesting that affection is entangled with material dependence.
Tone
Nash's tone is playful, brisk, and slyly judgmental, as if he is delivering a witty speech while quietly undercutting every solemn expectation about marriage. The emotional atmosphere is light and comic, but it also carries a sharper edge: the reader feels the pressure of constant disagreement, the annoyance of daily compromise, and the amusement that comes from recognizing those tensions as normal. The poem never becomes bitter, yet its laughter depends on noticing how little couples actually agree on.
Historical Context
Ogden Nash is known for light verse that uses humor, rhyme, and verbal surprise to comment on everyday life. His work belongs to a twentieth-century American comic tradition that often treats modern manners, domestic life, and social pretension with wit rather than solemnity. This poem fits that tradition by turning marriage into a subject for playful observation instead of sentimental celebration.
The poem also reflects a broader literary interest in exposing the gap between idealized institutions and lived experience. In modern comic poetry, marriage often appears not as a perfect union but as a negotiation between personalities, habits, and practical realities. Nash's style depends on colloquial speech, exaggeration, and satiric observation, all of which are characteristic of light verse in the period.
Turn off ads, get more exposure for your poetry, and get more features with a
Premium Membership.