The Prologue

1

To sing of wars, of captains, and of kings,
Of cities founded, commonwealths begun,
For my mean pen, are too superior things,
And how they all, or each, their dates have run
Let poets, and historians set these forth,
My obscure verse shall not so dim their worth.


2

But when my wond'ring eyes, and envious heart,
Great Bartas' sugared lines do but read o'er,
Fool, I do grudge the Muses did not part
'Twixt him and me that overfluent store;
A Bartas can do what a Bartas will,
But simple I, according to my skill.


3

From schoolboy's tongue, no rhetoric we expect,
Nor yet a sweet consort, from broken strings,
Nor perfect beauty, where's a main defect;
My foolish, broken, blemished Muse so sings;
And this to mend, alas, no art is able,
'Cause nature made it so irreparable.


4

Nor can I, like that fluent sweet-tongued Greek
Who lisped at first, speak afterwards more plain.
By art, he gladly found what he did seek,
A full requital of his striving pain:
Art can do much, but this maxim's most sure.
A weak or wounded brain admits no cure.


5

I am obnoxious to each carping tongue,
Who says my hand a needle better fits;
A poet's pen all scorn I should thus wrong;
For such despite they cast on female wits:
If what I do prove well, it won't advance,
They'll say it's stolen, or else it was by chance.


6

But sure the antique Greeks were far more mild,
Else of our sex, why feigned they those nine,
And poesy made Calliope's own child?
So 'mongst the rest they placed the arts divine:
But this weak knot they will full soon untie,
The Greeks did nought, but play the fool and lie.


7

Let Greeks be Greeks, and women what they are,
Men have precedency, and still excel;
It is but vain, unjustly to wage war;
Men can do best, and women know it well;
Preeminence in each and all is yours,
Yet grant some small acknowledgement of ours.


8

And oh, ye high flown quills that soar the skies,
And ever with your prey, still catch your praise,
If e'er you deign these lowly lines your eyes,
Give wholesome parsley wreath, I ask no bays:
This mean and unrefinèd stuff of mine,
Will make your glistering gold but more to shine.

Form: Lyric Comments

Literary Analysis

This literary analysis was generated with AI and may contain interpretive differences. Provide your analysis in the comments section.

Summary

Anne Bradstreet frames her poem as a self-conscious entrance into a literary world dominated by grand subjects and famous names. She begins by setting aside the traditional material of epic poetry-war, rulers, founding nations-because such matters seem beyond the reach of her "mean" pen. From there, the poem turns inward: she measures herself against admired male poets, especially the French poet Bartas, and worries that her own talent is flawed, limited, and easily dismissed. What begins as apparent modesty gradually becomes a carefully argued defense of poetic ability itself.

The poem's progression moves from personal insecurity to a broader challenge about gender and artistic authority. Bradstreet acknowledges the common prejudice that women belong to domestic work rather than literary achievement, then answers it by pointing to the classical tradition that honored the arts and their female figures. Even so, she does not fully claim equality in a triumphant way; instead, she ends with a subtle request for recognition. The poem's central tension lies in that balance between humility and ambition: Bradstreet repeatedly lowers her own claims while also insisting that women deserve a place, however modest, in the republic of letters.

Form Breakdown

Theme

  • Poetic humility - Bradstreet presents herself as too small for elevated subjects, but the self-denying posture also becomes a rhetorical strategy that lets her speak confidently about poetry.
  • Gender and authorship - The poem confronts the suspicion directed at women writers, showing how female creativity is judged more harshly and explained away as imitation or accident.
  • Art versus nature - Bradstreet suggests that skill can refine talent, yet she also emphasizes the limits imposed by nature, especially when ability is doubted or constrained.
  • Classical learning - References to Greek myth and earlier poetic traditions place her work in conversation with the literary canon she both admires and questions.
  • Recognition without triumph - The poem asks for acknowledgment rather than domination, making room for women's contributions without pretending the cultural hierarchy has disappeared.
  • Literary inheritance - By invoking established poets and ancient models, Bradstreet shows that writing is shaped by influence, imitation, and adaptation rather than solitary genius alone.

Literary Devices

  • Allusion - References to Bartas, the Greeks, Calliope, and the arts of antiquity place the poem within a wider literary tradition and help Bradstreet measure her own work against respected models.
  • Extended metaphor - Poetry is repeatedly figured through tools, musical instruments, and woven materials, suggesting both craft and fragility in the making of verse.
  • Irony - The poem's modest self-disparagement is not simply self-erasure; it ironically strengthens Bradstreet's authority by demonstrating wit, control, and awareness of audience expectations.
  • Antithesis - Bradstreet sets opposites against each other, such as men and women, high and low subjects, or polished and broken artistry, to sharpen the poem's argument.
  • Rhetorical address - Direct appeals to readers and learned poets create the sense of a public defense, as if the poem were spoken before a skeptical audience.
  • Enumeration - The opening lists of wars, captains, kings, and cities establish the scale of conventional heroic poetry before the poem turns away from it.
  • Hyperbole - Phrases that exaggerate weakness or flaw underscore the depth of the speaker's insecurity while also revealing the conventional posture of modesty.

Symbolism

  • Wars, captains, and kings - These stand for the grand historical subjects traditionally reserved for epic and official histories, which Bradstreet feels are beyond her scope.
  • Needle - The needle symbolizes the domestic role critics assign to women, reducing female labor to sewing rather than literary creation.
  • Pen - The pen represents authorship and intellectual agency, which Bradstreet defends even as she calls her own pen unworthy.
  • Muses - The Muses symbolize poetic inspiration and the cultural legitimacy of art, highlighting the unfairness of artistic gifts being distributed unequally.
  • Bays - The laurel wreath signals public poetic honor and acclaim, which Bradstreet respectfully asks not to be denied, even if only a smaller token is granted.
  • Parsley wreath - This humbler wreath symbolizes modest recognition, suggesting that even partial praise would still acknowledge her work.

Tone

Bradstreet's tone is modest, witty, and defensively intelligent. She sounds outwardly self-effacing, but the careful structure of her comparisons and concessions reveals quiet confidence. For the reader, the mood is both intimate and argumentative: the poem feels like a private apology that gradually turns into a public claim for respect. The emotional effect is one of restrained resolve, as if the poem is bowing even while making its case.

Historical Context

Anne Bradstreet wrote within the early colonial Puritan world, where literary production was closely tied to religious seriousness and where women's public authorship could seem unusual or presumptuous. Her poem also reflects the influence of Renaissance literary culture, especially classical learning and the English admiration for continental and humanist poets. The tension between learned poetry and modest self-presentation is typical of the period, but Bradstreet gives it a distinctly female perspective.

The poem belongs to a broader tradition in which poets defend the value of their work while navigating social hierarchy. Classical references to the Muses and to Greek literary authority were common touchstones for writers seeking legitimacy. Bradstreet uses those conventions to enter a male-dominated literary conversation, showing how a woman writer could claim participation in high art while still recognizing the cultural limits placed on her.

Similar Poems

Comments About This Poem

Share your interpretation, favorite passage, or thoughts about this famous poem. Please provide an in-depth and meaningful comment.

  • What do you think the poet was trying to say?
  • Which line had the biggest impact on you?
  • How does this poem relate to modern life?
  • What literary devices did you notice?
No comments have been posted yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.
Get a Premium Membership
Turn off ads, get more exposure for your poetry, and get more features with a Premium Membership.
Book: Diverse Voices: The Poetry of Human Rights and the Pursuit of Peace