To Richard Dawkins and His Imp

***Richard Dawkins is a leading scientific-atheist who claims that the universe was created from 'nothing'; he also snubs belief in God and is an activist against spirituality and religion. This man is funded and hired by the NWO in an attempt to remove all obstacles in the way of world domination.*** Something came from nothing? What's this? Am I supposed to believe also that from something nothing comes? Hmmm...... Number one: Einstein once said that only a fool would claim to know the absolute --- since we still have to do research we cannot claim to know EVERYTHING Number two: Science has not even to be able to solve the mysteries of the simplest atom: the hydrogen atom So how can it claim to know the immense mysteries and design of the universe? Number three: It is claimed that there is only one in a ten trillion chance that the universe was not CAUSED Number four: Visual proof for the existence of God is uneccessary: Almost EVERYTHING we KNOW is unseen Consider this: if one were to require visual evidence for God's existence it would be quite impossible; they are asking the most powerful being in all existence to unveil Himself in compact form: they would be incinerated Number five: There are three forms of knowledge: perception, reason, and intellect. The ultimate design of the universe can only be grasped by the intellect. Science only uses perception and reason to deduct facts about the material world. Physics cannot claim to know the ultimate origin of life ITSELF for this is the field of metaphysics. Number six: We are only some 300 generations removed from the Stone-Age; we are only beginning to understand the origin and nature of our existence. Being the world that the state that is in ---- science is too slow with its turtle pace to solve our most difficult problems; morality and ethics ---- which is infinitely more important than science since there will be no science if we destroy the earth. Since we live in a temporal plane, in which all things have a beginning and an end, everything is contingent upon something else for its existence; if we were to trace the origins of this process we must arrive to something unlike the contingent, for it can only be something un-contingent which began everything; else chance would be the cause of life as know it, yet chance requires two or more things for it to happen at all.