Home » Poems » Poetry Art » Poetry Art / Greeting Card Maker

Greeting Card Maker | Poem Art Generator

Free online greeting card maker or poetry art generator. Create free custom printable greeting cards or art from photos and text online. Use PoetrySoup's free online software to make greeting cards from poems, quotes, or your own words. Generate memes, cards, or poetry art for any occasion; weddings, anniversaries, holidays, etc (See examples here). Make a card to show your loved one how special they are to you. Once you make a card, you can email it, download it, or share it with others on your favorite social network site like Facebook. Also, you can create shareable and downloadable cards from poetry on PoetrySoup. Use our poetry search engine to find the perfect poem, and then click the camera icon to create the card or art.

Text
Layout
Background

Enter Title (Not Required)

Enter Poem or Quote (Required)Required
In 1968, a time of great concern for healthy human civil rights for and of women as well as LeftBrain culturally dominant men, Gregory Bateson invited a Symposium not quite a finished Symphony proposing Moral and Aesthetic Structure of Human [Climate] Adaptation. He closed his invitation to show up as follows [with my own updating Earth Climate Rights commentary in brackets]: We have perhaps what Sir Geoffrey Vickers has called an 'ecology of ideas.' [a health v pathology ecology, climates of and for ideas, learning and unlearning climates for therapeutic adaptive/maladaptive purposes]. If it be true that certain people are specially gifted in the [polypathic multicultural] art of acting upon complex [eco]systems with [empathic trust/mistrust balancing] homeostatic or ecological characteristics, and that these people do not [co]operate by spelling out the interaction of all relevant [health/pathology] variables, then these people must use some inner [health of] ecology of ideas as an [ecosystemic] analogic model. (By 'ideas' I mean thoughts, premises, affects, [feelings, attendance, listening, relational, empathies] perceptions of self, etc.) But if this [empathic trust/mistrust] skill is, in some sense, really an art [of ego/eco-listening] then it is possible that the inner 'ecology of ideas' is a close synonym of what might also be called aesthetic [affective-cognitive] sensibility [and dissonance]. These notions suggest, finally, that there may be another approach to the problems of a Theory of [Therapeutic EarthRights-HumaneRights] Action. As I write this, on November 5, 1968, the nation is voting to choose a President and the voters are faced by alternative candidates-- none of whom even claims to have either [ecological] aesthetic or [ecopolitical] biological insight into the [empathic healthy trust] affairs of a large [cooperative] nation. Be that as it may, I suggest that before we proceed to a consideration of theories of [therapeutic] action, we should devote some time to the question of aesthetic [ecosystemically healthy-wealth] determinism [favoring power-with over power-over resolutions] for the following reasons: a. It is conceivable that there is a whole other order of determinative [health/pathology] factors, to ignore which would be as fatal as to ignore the homeostatic [co-empathic trust/mistrust] aspect of biological [nutritional-digestive] systems. b. It is possible that the aesthetic [truth-as-beauty, symmetry, affinitive proportion] approach, with its special emphasis upon [natural] patterns and the [emergent] modulation of [ecotherapeutic] patterns, may be a natural development out of mem-theory and 0-graphs [fractal, 4D binary bilateral metric information prime empty-climate, vacuum of nutritional information, 'wallpaper' or dialectally folding/unfolding landscape group/game theory reiterative-revolving systemic] c. It is possible that the [co-empathic] aesthetic is in some [bicameral] way closely related to or [and] derivative from the cybernetic [genetic-binary, reiteratively double-bind bilateral balancing tree-root nutritional health structure]. d. It is possible that the aesthetic approach may provide short cuts to the [deductive-only] evaluation and [Left v RightBrain] criticism of plans for [therapeutic] action. e. It is possible that [basic] aesthetic [empathic trust] perception may be characteristic of [ecologically healthy bicameral-balancing] human beings, so that action plans which ignore this characteristic of [Left-Right equivalent] human perception are unlikely to be [power-with, cooperatively, struggling with as not against] adopted, and even unlikely to be [cooperatively] practicable [because not supported by ecopolitical social-cultural dominant structures despite evolutionary history as ethological witness to mindbodies of and for health regeneration]. f. It is possible that aesthetic computation and aesthetic creativity are subject to pathological disturbance [mindbody illness] Certainly creative and artistic processes are in part determined by epoch and [Left and/or RightBrain dominance and/or equivalent] cultural milieu [climate]. It is likely therefore that pathologies of culture will produce [ecopolitical] pathologies of [ugly, terrifying, vacuous, nihilistic] aesthetic perception and [reductive, seductive iconic] monsters of [mistrusting and ambiguous] aesthetic creation. g. But, conversely, if the aesthetically [oppositional bipolar either-or Left v appositionally dipolar both-and Right] monstrous be symptomatic of cultural [ecopolitical climate] pathology, then we have to remember that in all such [sacred ecosystemic] cases, the symptom is the [pathology] system's attempt to cure itself [ourselves]. The creation of the appropriate [evil-reverses-live, terrorist, abusive, neglectful] monstrosities might therefore be a component in corrective [purgative] action. It is possible that some contemporary [subclimates for nutritional landscape optimization permacultural] artists are actually doing [multiculturally inclusive healthy] things which we in our conference hope to plan to do [both economically and politically re-acclimative volution]. For these and related reasons, I think that we should take a good look at the [climatic] problems of [empathic trust/mistrust] aesthetics before we go on to the [ecological] problems of [therapeutic climate] action. [With Bateson's late premillennial concerns, we continue to engage our Left-Right bicameral mindbody balancing equivalent powers within ecological ethics and ecosystemic aesthetics felt and learned and exegeted through our ecopolitically cooperative therapeutic choices of and for multiculturally polypathic democracies of and for Earth as Humane-Home Sacred Rights both within as without Ta(o)-Zen Centric MultiCultural Climate-Health Landscapes.]

Enter Author Name (Not Required)

Move Text:

Heading Text

Color:

Main/Poem Text

Color:

Layout: TallShort

www.poetrysoup.com - Create a card from your words, quote, or poetry

Earth's Humane Rights To Healthy Climates

In 1968, a time of great concern for healthy human civil rights for and of women as well as LeftBrain culturally dominant men, Gregory Bateson invited a Symposium not quite a finished Symphony proposing Moral and Aesthetic Structure of Human [Climate] Adaptation. He closed his invitation to show up as follows [with my own updating Earth Climate Rights commentary in brackets]: We have perhaps what Sir Geoffrey Vickers has called an 'ecology of ideas.' [a health v pathology ecology, climates of and for ideas, learning and unlearning climates for therapeutic adaptive/maladaptive purposes]. If it be true that certain people are specially gifted in the [polypathic multicultural] art of acting upon complex [eco]systems with [empathic trust/mistrust balancing] homeostatic or ecological characteristics, and that these people do not [co]operate by spelling out the interaction of all relevant [health/pathology] variables, then these people must use some inner [health of] ecology of ideas as an [ecosystemic] analogic model. (By 'ideas' I mean thoughts, premises, affects, [feelings, attendance, listening, relational, empathies] perceptions of self, etc.) But if this [empathic trust/mistrust] skill is, in some sense, really an art [of ego/eco-listening] then it is possible that the inner 'ecology of ideas' is a close synonym of what might also be called aesthetic [affective-cognitive] sensibility [and dissonance]. These notions suggest, finally, that there may be another approach to the problems of a Theory of [Therapeutic EarthRights-HumaneRights] Action. As I write this, on November 5, 1968, the nation is voting to choose a President and the voters are faced by alternative candidates-- none of whom even claims to have either [ecological] aesthetic or [ecopolitical] biological insight into the [empathic healthy trust] affairs of a large [cooperative] nation. Be that as it may, I suggest that before we proceed to a consideration of theories of [therapeutic] action, we should devote some time to the question of aesthetic [ecosystemically healthy-wealth] determinism [favoring power-with over power-over resolutions] for the following reasons: a. It is conceivable that there is a whole other order of determinative [health/pathology] factors, to ignore which would be as fatal as to ignore the homeostatic [co-empathic trust/mistrust] aspect of biological [nutritional-digestive] systems. b. It is possible that the aesthetic [truth-as-beauty, symmetry, affinitive proportion] approach, with its special emphasis upon [natural] patterns and the [emergent] modulation of [ecotherapeutic] patterns, may be a natural development out of mem-theory and 0-graphs [fractal, 4D binary bilateral metric information prime empty-climate, vacuum of nutritional information, 'wallpaper' or dialectally folding/unfolding landscape group/game theory reiterative-revolving systemic] c. It is possible that the [co-empathic] aesthetic is in some [bicameral] way closely related to or [and] derivative from the cybernetic [genetic-binary, reiteratively double-bind bilateral balancing tree-root nutritional health structure]. d. It is possible that the aesthetic approach may provide short cuts to the [deductive-only] evaluation and [Left v RightBrain] criticism of plans for [therapeutic] action. e. It is possible that [basic] aesthetic [empathic trust] perception may be characteristic of [ecologically healthy bicameral-balancing] human beings, so that action plans which ignore this characteristic of [Left-Right equivalent] human perception are unlikely to be [power-with, cooperatively, struggling with as not against] adopted, and even unlikely to be [cooperatively] practicable [because not supported by ecopolitical social-cultural dominant structures despite evolutionary history as ethological witness to mindbodies of and for health regeneration]. f. It is possible that aesthetic computation and aesthetic creativity are subject to pathological disturbance [mindbody illness] Certainly creative and artistic processes are in part determined by epoch and [Left and/or RightBrain dominance and/or equivalent] cultural milieu [climate]. It is likely therefore that pathologies of culture will produce [ecopolitical] pathologies of [ugly, terrifying, vacuous, nihilistic] aesthetic perception and [reductive, seductive iconic] monsters of [mistrusting and ambiguous] aesthetic creation. g. But, conversely, if the aesthetically [oppositional bipolar either-or Left v appositionally dipolar both-and Right] monstrous be symptomatic of cultural [ecopolitical climate] pathology, then we have to remember that in all such [sacred ecosystemic] cases, the symptom is the [pathology] system's attempt to cure itself [ourselves]. The creation of the appropriate [evil-reverses-live, terrorist, abusive, neglectful] monstrosities might therefore be a component in corrective [purgative] action. It is possible that some contemporary [subclimates for nutritional landscape optimization permacultural] artists are actually doing [multiculturally inclusive healthy] things which we in our conference hope to plan to do [both economically and politically re-acclimative volution]. For these and related reasons, I think that we should take a good look at the [climatic] problems of [empathic trust/mistrust] aesthetics before we go on to the [ecological] problems of [therapeutic climate] action. [With Bateson's late premillennial concerns, we continue to engage our Left-Right bicameral mindbody balancing equivalent powers within ecological ethics and ecosystemic aesthetics felt and learned and exegeted through our ecopolitically cooperative therapeutic choices of and for multiculturally polypathic democracies of and for Earth as Humane-Home Sacred Rights both within as without Ta(o)-Zen Centric MultiCultural Climate-Health Landscapes.]